I am going to post some really general information on religions from a more academic perspective. Keep in mind, it has been quite a few years (a little more than a decade) since I have really studied this and related topics, so I will try to keep this pretty general. I will also pull ideas from my previous posts on the topic of religion too, as well as some of my other related unpublished works.
I am writing this first, because I have wanted to write this post for a very, very, very long time, and second, as a precursor to an upcoming post talking about Alien Conspiracies. Why would I talk about religion as a precursor to a post about Alien Conspiracies? Well, I guess you will have to see how I tie it all together when you read that post! =) =P
Read this post en toto first and then you can read it: Alien Conspiracies?
What are Religions?
Religions developed as an evolutionary adaptation after Humanity evolved from more of a reptilian (reactive) brain species to a ‘moral animal‘ (proactive) brain species with increased:
- brain size and capacity
- creativity, curiosity, and ability to innovate
More specifically, because of those intellectual increases, religions and superstitions developed as a coping strategy to help Humanity, especially in our earliest formative moments, to compensate for the increased awareness of our ignorance, agency, mortality, and our self-awareness.
Religions and superstitions are human constructs that take our collective and individual ignorances and fears, and personifying and labeling them through imaginary anthropomorphic entities such as:
- supernatural (witches, dryads, faerie, leprechauns, vampires, ghouls, ghosts, werewolves)
- divine (Yahweh, God, Osiris, Dionysus, Loki, Great Sky Spirit, The Green Man, Ahura Mazda, Astarte, Shiva)
… and doing so as a coping method which allows us to:
- rationalize or explain things we did not understand
- alleviate pains and fears due to our ignorances
For millennia (even today), partaking of one can be a powerful coping strategy that has been used to attempt to help make ourselves feel like we can make better sense of things, or to be able to lay blame for our misfortune, bad luck, and despair on something with a concrete label instead of just saying “I don’t know.” or “That’s just life.” and being OK with that. It is easier to cope with problems and fears when we believe that something is responsible that has an identifiable label (spirits, gods, witches, pixies), than it is to cope with something that does not such as when we say “We just do not know why or how.”.
Consider the following examples:
Example 1: A person who is very sick and goes from healer to healer who cannot tell them concretely what is wrong nor provide any real help – cannot tell them what the name is for their disease or issue – and yet they are still suffering.
In historical context it is easier to hear that “You have offended The Spirit of the Great Willow!” and to work towards fixing that, than to hear “We do not know and there is nothing we can do.” and to just wallow in pain and depression.
Example 2: A woman’s young child dies after falling from a tree, and the mother, wailing in anguish, wants to know why, why has this happened to her baby.
In historical context it is easier to hear that “It was the work that witch who lives at the end of the village!” and to work towards fixing that, rather than to be told that “Accidents just happen. It is tragic, but there is nothing we can do.“.
This phenomenon is especially powerful when a populace is similarly afflicted such as through earthquakes, floods. contagious diseases, poverty, and war. Not knowing what is wrong or why such bad things happen and why for an extended period of time can be very depressing and can have significant adverse psychological effects which can create further negative biopychosocial effects due to that.
Consider the following example:
Example 3: A contagious disease rampages through a settlement killing 1/3 of the population (Bubonic plague anyone?) and people have no idea why or how, and they despair in the losses of their family and friends.
In historical context it is easier to hear that “We are being punished because we have offended the gods!” and to work towards fixing that, than to hear again that “We do not know and there is nothing we can do.“.
Once we have a label for that which plagues us such as divine wrath or you have angered the spirits (whether rightly or wrongly attributed) then people can start to feel better and even come together in solace for being similarly afflicted, and even attempt to solve the problem (appease the Willow Spirit or to burn the witch or to increase sacrifices to the gods), which increases in-group loyalty and cohesion instead of suffering further from panic, violence, or riots from not knowing what is wrong or why. Such wrongful attribution may help to collectively alleviate those external stressors upon an individual or community as well as the associated negative biopsychosocial effects.
Religions, especially the more ancient formations, try to fill the role of providing labels for that which ails us and to make us feel better about our ignorance by providing a level of ‘healing through attribution‘ (whether correctly or incorrectly attributed) as illustrated in the above examples. This is especially important for societal control and cohesion as a coping mechanism due to the extreme level of ignorance and fears, especially among of the oldest human civilizations.
The Perimeter of Humanity’s Ignorance
The Notorious NdT (Neil deGrasse Tyson) gave an amazing presentation at Beyond Belief: Science, Religion, Reason, and Survival in 2006 whose title is “The Perimeter of Ignorance“. This presentation was powerful and enlightening. He goes over example after example of what happens with the most brilliant people throughout history (such as Ptolemy and Isaac Newton) when they reach their limits to explain something. When the most brilliant minds the world has ever seen have reached the limits of their ability to explain something, even they say it must be due to the hand of the divine. Strangely, a hundred years or more passes and we are able to explain it (therefore is NOT divine), and so the cycle continues. The cycle shows that it was NOT a supernatural or divine entity, but the just a temporal encounter with the perimeter of humanity’s ignorance.
This phenomenon is also referred to as the God of the Gaps – where Humanity fills in the holes of our ignorance with God(s) as the obvious explanation – as if like saying ‘It was God!’ was a universal existential putty to fill the holes of our ignorance, to magically explain the things we cannot explain. The next question to ask those who would invoke such a fallacious answer would be “Which god?” since Humanity has have so many to choose from (over 5,000): Yahweh, God, The Green Man, The Goddess, Osiris, Zeus, Thor, Ahura Mazda, Shiva, Astarte, etc.
Historical Evolution of Religion
As you go forward through time from humanity’s beginnings as our population centers expanded and our knowledge of the world slowly expanded, its religions have evolved and adapted in scope and use to meet their various needs. Reasons for historical religious evolution:
- expanding tribal population and scope
- increasing understanding of the world
- expanding fears and ignorances
- to meet societal, social, and cultural needs
See the main image at the top of this post for the Evolutionary Tree of Myth and Religion.
Historically religions have formed, evolved, or sprouted into being through the three following general historical types:
- Small Population Formations – concentrating mostly on the highly localized natural world (earliest religions created – most of human history – older than about 10,000 – 12,000+ years)
- Large Population Formations – tending towards polytheism (religions created in the middle of human history – last 8,000 years or so)
- Cosmopolitan Formations (post-Abrahamic Faiths) – concentrating on moral of philosophical values (newest religions or ethical philosophies created – last 200 years or so)
Indigenous religions (the oldest religions) all tend to be a form of spiritism (Small. Population Formations). Western and European religions (middle of human history) tend to be polytheistic at their base (Large Population Formations), with the rise of monolatry as is found in the Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) somewhat of a historical religious anomaly.
Small Population Formations
When the Earth had its smallest human populations, during early hunter-gatherer societies and early tribalistic periods, religious formations start out being hyperlocalized – the spirit of animals or that strange rock formation or that really large tree over there. Then, as their populations traveled or grew, and their understanding of the world increased, so did the scope of their localized spirits which shifted to spirits of a geographical site (forest, river, lake, mountain range, etc). This formation covers most indigenous and nature based religions as well as most pre-agrarian societies.
|spiritism (local)||spirit of the rock of the tree, of the stream|
|spiritism (geographical)||spirits of the lake, forest, hills, mountains|
Large Population Formations
For religions created during later tribalistic periods there is a shift from geographical spirits to tribal gods (Canaanites), and then to a much larger cultural/national pantheons of gods (Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Hindu).
|polytheism (tribal)||gods unique to each tribe, or smaller group people which covers a small geographic area|
|polytheism (national)||gods unique to each nation, culture, or peoples which covers a large geographical area|
|monolatry/monotheism||A more recent and anomalous historical development – the belief that the one god, in spite of and over, all others|
With expanding population centers later being defined by nation states and there being a significant increase in knowledge of the world through the advent of such disciplines as: history, ethics, arts, astronomy, physics, math, philosophy, etc:
- the scope of their gods expanded to be national instead of localized and tribal
- they essentially separated them from direct ties to the localized natural world to live in the skies (or other essentially unreachable place) so their divine entities are more generalized and available to a larger populace
- these new god’s influence expanded to cover broad portfolios such as: war, love, fertility, plants, luck, etc instead of more localized features such as a tree or rock which might have similar very localized influence
With the largest populations present that Earth has ever seen and at the current height of Human knowledge, the more modern religious formations tend to concentrate on:
- the philosophical and ethical foundations of religions, life, existence
- less on the natural world in specific or whether there is or is not the divine
- concentrating on ecological and humanitarian preservation and where humanity stands in the scheme of things – tending towards a sort of a global eco-humanistic (a)religious view.
|pantheism||all is part of the divine – many paths, one truth|
|humanism||humanity is responsible for its own damnation or salvation|
|atheism/secularism||there is no real divine or supernatural, just existence;|
Here is a neat comic strip which illustrates this overall historical evolution of religions through the ages:
Historical Pattern of Religious Evolution
As you look at what I have written above especially in light of NdT‘s presentation, you will see a pattern here: the growth and evolution of religious formation evolves along with the:
- growth of our population centers
- growth of human knowledge (and inversely to our worldly ignorances)
At the height of our ignorance our religions focused on the immediate natural world which was not understood (disease, seasons, life, death, personal accidents such as a broken leg). As our knowledge of the world grew then we traded in spirits for gods. Then we traded in gods for philosophies and eco-consciousnesses.
At the height of our ignorance we attributed almost everything to the spirits and supernatural immediately surrounding us, but eventually those walls of ignorance and false attribution are torn down due to experience, knowledge, truth, and science once we understood it. Once we understood how or why something happens then people no longer falsely attribute those occurrences to the supernatural or the divine, and then its explanation falls under the purview of science and fact. When that happens, then we are able to do something about it and science and innovation takes off to fully understand and then to solve that problem. At that moment, everything that is beyond our understanding and explanation is then again attributed to the supernatural or the divine. The cycle continues as we are forever encountering the perimeter of Humanity’s ignorance.
Issues with Conservative Religion, Superstition, and Mythology
This section is going to be rather large so strap yourself in for we have a lot of background and leg work to setup the conversation. This will also contribute to our conversation on the evolution of religion and personal choice in religion, as well as the conversation for the last section of this post.
Psychological Factors in Religious Belief
Below I am going to talk about a few things to get you thinking, I will cover a few technical topics in psychology which I will relate together at the end to make a few points. I will cover the following topics:
- Schrödinger’s Cat and Schrödinger’s Smilodon
- False Positives and False Negatives
- Pascal’s Wager
- Morale Psychology and Other Psychological Factors
I know! I know! Why is all of this sciencey stuff in a talk about religion. Dagnabbit, boy! Keep you science away from my religion! Just hang with me here, because I am actually going somewhere with this.=)
Let’s talk about Schrödinger’s Smilodon! But first, in order to understand that, we need to talk about Schrödinger’s Cat! There was a scientist named Erwin Schrödinger that postulated a thought experiment that we call Schrödinger’s Cat which was useful for thinking about quantum superpositioning. This thought experiment basically states that if we have this box with a cat in it which also has a radioactive isotope and a poison in it, that we do not know if the cat is alive or dead until we open the box to check. In this case, before opening the box, the cat’s state is both dead and alive (unknown) until we know for sure by opening the box.
For the examples below we will use something we will call Schrödinger’s Smilodon which is a smilodon – a large predatory prehistoric cat (@Wikipedia, @New Dinosaurs) – that is both there and not there (unknown state) hunting in the bushes until the hunters check to know for sure, which would end up either good for the hunters (not there) or bad for the hunters (is there and hungry). =O
Got it so far? Schrödinger’s Smilodon – a smilodon with an unknown state (both there/not there) until the hunters know for sure.
False Positives and False Negatives
In psychology there is something referred to as a false negative and a false positive which shall relate directly to our Schrödinger’s Smilodon in the situations below where we will follow some prehistoric hunters who are hunting in a forest and hear a sound which gets them thinking it might be a smilodon hunting in the forest. This moment gives us our Schrödinger’s Smilodon because they do not know for sure if it is there.
A false negative means: a person falsely assumes something is NOT correct when it is, in fact, true which can be dangerous.
As an example: Our prehistoric hunters hear a sound and they think it might be a hungry smilodon hunting them. This gives us Schrödinger’s Smilodon, because in that moment the smilodon is both there and not there (an unknown state)… because the hunters do not know for sure.
In this case, the hunters do NOT assume that the sound they just heard was a hunting smilodon, when in fact it really was, which ends up with the hunters being smilodon lunch. =( That is a false negative. False negative = smilodon lunch.
A false positive means: a person falsely assumes something is true when it is, in fact, NOT true which can also be dangerous, but generally less so, when applied in this context.
As an example: Our intrepid prehistoric hunters hear a sound and they think it might be a smilodon hunting them in the forest. This gives us Schrödinger’s Smilodon, because, in that moment, the smilodon is both there and not there (an unknown state)… because the hunters do not know for sure.
In this case, the hunters DO assume that the sound they just heard was a hunting smilodon, so they end up taking defensive precautions allowing them to escape unharmed regardless of whether or not there was a smilodon there (there wasn’t). In either case, the hunters are safe because they assumed there was danger and then acted accordingly to protect themselves allowing them to live to hunt another day. False Positive = He who assumes there is a hunting smilodon in the bush lives to hunt another day!
As an evolutionary adaptation, assuming something is potentially dangerous, being risk averse (scaring more easily) as a defensive posture is safer than assuming it is not. Those early humans who developed this adaptation allowed them to be safer and to survive longer because they preferred to assume that something was dangerous and taking the appropriate action to protect themselves resulting in the evolution of a more sensitive fight-or-flight response.
In this day and age, when we apply false positives to people’s choice or belief in religion this sets us up for something called Pascal’s Wager which says something like: It is safer to assume that God(s) exists and to be fearful and obedient (and rewarded) than it is to not believe and not obedient (and hence punished).
See how that all came together? No? OK, so here is the line of logic:
- Those people who, when faced with a choice to believe that something is a threat or not, (Schrödinger’s Smilodon)
- … and have evolved have a higher sense of risk aversion, are more fearful, or easily give in to fear will assume something is dangerous (false positive),
- … and therefore would develop the tendency to give in to religion or even have the desire for religion for fear of divine reprisal (Pascal’s Wager).
Here is a simpler way to say it: Those who have an evolutionarily heightened sense of fear will tend to be religious.
Moral Psychology and Other Psychological Factors
Now, on to the last part of this section. In the previous sections I laid the groundwork to show you that those who are risk averse will tend to be religious. I am going to apply a few other areas of psychology here to take this a step further. Specifically, I am going to work with conservative psychology as seen through the lens of moral psychology and a few other relevant studies. I cover a quite a bit of the base concepts of moral psychology in my post titled Morality vs Religion which is where I will pull almost all of this section from. Please take the time to read that post to really prepare yourself for this section, because I will not explain these in detail here. I will quickly cover the parts that are pertinent which will focus on conservative psychology and religious belief.
So, on to moral psychology. From moral psychology, as talked about in my above post, conservatives score high on these three (of the 5) moral psychological factors:
- In-Group Loyalty (Tribalism) – hold their tribe and members as more trustworthy and safe – others who are different and not a member of their tribe are probably not
- Authority/Respect – respect and prefer their authority structures to a fault
- Purity/Sanctity – believe in the infallibility of their authority and their own beliefs
From other contemporary studies they also tend to have the following psychological traits:
- negativity bias – prefer negative things and see threats everywhere (false positives)
- intolerance of ambiguity – prefer things to be clear-cut, black and white, easy to understand or accept
If we combine Pascal’s Wager with conservative’s intolerance for ambiguity as well as the moral psychological factors from above, you will find a person that will find significant comfort in religion, especially conservative religion, because it will:
- be an authority which claims righteousness and infallibility (purity, authority),
- tell them unequivocally what is right and wrong (authority, purity, intolerance of ambiguity),
- brand minority (and other groups) a threat (negativity bias, loyalty, purity, intolerance of ambiguity)
… which pings all of their psychological factors and keeps them angry, fearful, motivated, blindly faithful, and… voting, especially during midterm elections. =O
As a part of this, they do not like to have to think or consider the implications of their beliefs or actions because that would bring about the horrors of cognitive dissonance and ambiguity as well as the potential that they may be wrong, which would challenge and violate their perception of purity and authority of the themselves, their authority (church), and tribe. Therefore, if they do not think about it, and blindly commit themselves to their beliefs and cause, regardless of the consequences, then they will not have the think about it nor face external consequences because of the purity of their authority which tells them right from wrong, who the enemies are, and which also promises righteousness and eternal reward.
Conservative Religion as a Force for Corruption and Regression in the World
If we take into account the staggering implications of the previous section, you will see that fear is a powerful motivator due to not understanding the world, negativity bias, and a dislike for ambiguity within conservatives which keeps many in religion. Some stay even though they do not really believe not that they would allow themselves to even ask that question, but are going through the motions because they are afraid of going to Hell, being cursed, or angering the spirits (Pascal’s Wager); and others because they love the surety and perceived purity of the of their church (authority) and henceforth themselves and their self-selected church which supports their self-selected beliefs. All doing so regardless of whether or not these divine or supernatural things actually exist or not. That is not something they would ever question, for they were told by their church that it was undeniably true and that they, or their family, or their people would be punished for not believing, or that they would burn for eternity.
Divine Beliefs Conveniently Coincides with Personal Beliefs
Religion can even be an even more powerful tool for evil in the world when a person can pick and choose the religion and denomination that conveniently supports their world views and desires. Christianity has over 5,000 mainstream denominations world-wide and throughout history ranging from the theological humanism found in Unitarian Universalism to the far right and hate-filled fringe such as the Westborow Baptists.
If you hate racial and sexual minorities then there are denominations and religions for that. If you love the environment then there are denominations and religions for that too. Perhaps, the religion we chose reflects who we are as person. If a person chooses a hate-filled religion then that is who they are as a person and they just want justification and absolution for their desires and beliefs. If a person chooses a religion that supports humanity and the environment and is filled with compassion then, perhaps that is who they are as a person.
Keep in mind, I will not get into cultural, social, and religious indoctrination as well as the pernicious effects of monetary systems, but that is also something to keep in mind and makes this topic not as clear cut nor simple as I am making it out here for the purposes of this discussion.
Reza Aslan’s video talks about this: God doesn’t hate people.
Religion as a Tool for Removing Accountability
Because a person can find a religion to justify any sort of vile world view, religion and the supernatural then also becomes the really easy method to justify evil actions, to absolve one of guilt, or to keep from having to take responsibility for ones actions. A person can patently wash away their crimes by saying that the Devil or a witch made them do it, or that their god wanted them to do it, or that their god forgave them even for such heinous actions as slavery, genocide, human sacrifice, murder, or raping children; and there is no way to disprove them or to negate their assertion short of the fictitious divine or supernatural figure showing up for tea to state otherwise – and we know that is NOT going to happen. This is something that is very predominant even in today’s supposedly enlightened world.
As much as some would like to look upon Christianity as something pure and exceptional, it has been used to justify slavery, genocide, war, murder, and all sorts of other hate filled and horrific acts throughout its short existence in human history. I am not going to pick on only Christianity here, but most other religions, especially those that developed as Large Population Formations are guilty of this too.
You can see this with these more modern examples:
- Donald Trump’s absolution of several divorces and infidelity by fundamentalist churches;
- Mormons exiling their gay children to the streets;
- The Vatican covering up raging pedophilia within their ranks and summarily absolving them of guilt;
- Religious parents beating and torturing their kids while using their religious text to validate that their cruelty is according to the divine laws;
- Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians;
- African Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) which is found in both their Christian, Jewish, and Islamic sects;
- ISIS beheading children for listening to music.
The list is bountiful even in today’s world where religion conveniently absolves those who are responsible for horrific acts from any guilt and even providing them a false sense of righteousness for their vile actions. Not only are they providing absolution for their crimes against Humanity, but such belief systems also demand that they do some of these horrific things, as well as provide a twisted rationale and a powerful reward for it too. The video below with Greta Christina goes over many of these horrors.
Dogma Over People and the Environment
With the above sections on psychology and looking at their results we can find that, especially within conservative religious circles, that what matters to them is their dogma and beliefs no matter who is hurt in the process, for if they were to consider the real ramifications of their actions or to try taking responsibility for them then it would violate their moral psychological values and bring on dissonance and ambiguity which they cannot have, as well as result in challenging the purity of their authoritarian structures, their beliefs, as well as challenge their desire to NOT be eternally punished. To keep this from happening they blindly and zealously devote themselves to their religion which:
- they hand-picked to support their hatreds and views
- hands them views and enemies which conveniently aligns with their personal views
- conveniently absolves them from guilt for the dehumanizing beliefs and actions against their fellow humans
- even rewards them socially and eternally for their beliefs and actions
With a righteous hand they smite the unrighteous in their god’s name and, in doing so, they may be reviled by the nonbeliever, but they shall be granted heavenly and eternal rewards. Does this sound familiar? This is a very powerful motivation in not only in the Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) but most other religions around the world too in one form or another. This process is very problematic and, if Humanity is going to truly progress and bring peace to the world, then we must find a way around it or to stop it from poisoning our world and people.
Conservative Religion as a Powerful Force for Dehumanization of Our Fellow Human Beings
It is easy to sway and manipulate an ignorant, fearful, and blindly following populace because they do not know any better and cannot hope for better because the religious classes control exactly what the masses can hope for and what they must do in order to be saved (or to have the divine to shine upon them so their luck can change). This is a powerful force for the dehumanization of their fellow man. What horrors has humanity inflicted upon each other in the name of salvation because some words were written or spoken as an inspired form of social control or terrorism. Horrors such as:
- witch trials
- human sacrifice
- genocide of indigenous populations
- genocide of ethnic or religious minorities
- police brutality
- attacks on homosexual and transgendered peoples as well as other sexual minorities
- female genital mutilation, circumcision
Here is this amazing video of Greta Christina titled Why are you Atheists so Angry from Skepticon 4 in 2011 which goes over the many reasons that atheists are so angry at religion, some of which I have stated above. However, perhaps the most powerful thing she states is that: Atheists are NOT angry because what has been done to themselves, but for what has happened to others. Watch it and check out what she is talking about and listen to her rather large list. This is a powerful video:
Conservative Religion Inhibits Innovation and Problem Solving
Because of the surety that conservative religion brings – as in: ‘All you need is the our set of scriptures because all answers are in there!’, it has an affect of inhibiting innovation and problem solving by saying they have the answer and it should not be questioned, and to question it is sacrilegious – even though religion does not have a real answer that actually solves anything.
Don’t think! Pray and make offers to appease the divine. God will make everything work out. It is God’s will. The gods works in mysterious ways. This mentality results with, as Neil deGrasse Tyson so aptly put it, revelation replacing investigation.
Consider these two powerful historical examples:
The Rise of Christianity Within the Ancient Roman Empire: Here is an agonizing set of historical examples for you to ponder. After the keys to the then polytheistic Roman Empire were handed over to Christianity by Emperor Theodosius I:
- Christianity slaughtered many Pagans and Christians (non-Roman Orthodox Christians) as well as burned their many heretical scrolls and books of knowledge. Not only did we lose much the the knowledge of the other Christian sects such as the Gnostics who were branded heretical by the literalist Roman Orthodox Church, but also…
- The Library of Alexandria, much like Baghdad from below – was the greatest center of learning in its time, fell into disrepair and eventually burned down losing a great treasure trove of knowledge, history, science, and philosophy. Tragic!
- The Library of Alexandria’s sister temple, the Temple of Serapis, which also held much of the knowledge of the known world, was attacked by Roman Orthodox Christian zealots during Christianity’s rise which resulted in the slaughter of the the priests and acolytes that were there, as we as the slaughter of influential female Pagan philosopher Hypatia, and then they burned down the temple and its large collection of the world’s knowledge. The movie Agora from 2009 goes over this.
The Rise of Conservatism in Islam: Another painful example of this phenomenon is present towards the end of Neil deGrasse Tyson’s video from above. Start at about the 26 minute and 30 seconds mark where he talks about the amazing scientific advancements within the Arabic countries where Baghdad, which is in present day Iraq, was the intellectual center of the world prior to the rise and corruption of conservativism within Islam.
See what happened to scientific discovery and discourse following its conservative evolution. Islam had a 300 year period of amazing scientific and philosophical advancements and then, with the rise of the control of conservativism within Islam, that ended – that 300 year period with an explosion of knowledge and science came to a screeching halt. This is a powerful and sad example.
How much art, philosophy, history, and science have we lost from these two tragic examples of revelation replacing investigation? There are many, many more examples replete throughout history.
There are even too many numerous smaller examples to count throughout history. Even in more recent times and our supposedly scientifically advanced times we have people who are:
- fighting to get rid of evolution in schools and replace it with creationism
- climate change denialists
- believing the earth is only 6,000 years old
- believing that the Earth is still flat
Religion as a Form of Social Control
Throughout almost all of human history, church and state were essentially one entity, especially during early human history (i.e. shaman and tribe) and through the middle of human history. It is even present now in the modern world (i.e. Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel, and Rome). The ubiquity of religions’ tentacles which has infected every single facet of politics and society has established itself as a form of ultra-powerful and cross class form of social and political control so that those in control can maintain their power by influencing the flow and bias of information and, more importantly, what the populace is willing to believe and do through the use fear for themselves, their families, their collective religious identities, and their nation which provides the genesis for the many vile ‘ism which infects our world: tribalism, nationalism, sexism, racism, and other divisive horrors.
By ensuring that the religious classes were the gatekeepers to knowledge, morality, power, and divine judgement they enshrined themselves as a privileged and rich ruling class while others suffered in ignorance and poverty. They even fought, cast down, and murdered the innocent that dared to challenge their power and self-proclaimed sanctity to ensure that the masses were kept ignorant and poor. This also allowed to them to use their sermons and religious and political influence to maintain their power through the control and bias of information flow since they (along with the rich) were the only real educated populations, as well as them being the chosen and privileged speakers for the divine whose wrath the people feared and whose favor they desperately desired for themselves and their families who were suffering.
Keeping people poor, fearful, and ignorant is required in order to perpetuate the religious and ruling class’ control, power, influence, and luxury because once the people understand the world broadly and no longer live in fear or despair, then the hold that religion has on the populace greatly diminishes. I talk about part of this phenomenon at the very beginning of this post: Systemic Suppression with America’s Two Party System. This vicious cycle sort of follows Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.
As long as their lower order needs (deficiency needs) are NOT met then religion will be prevalent and powerful because the people are ignorant, fearful, hungry, and without power or influence which is predominant in third world countries and among the poverty stricken around the world, so using religion as a powerful coping strategy becomes useful and prevalent.
Once their lower order needs are met and people are able to truly pursue higher order needs, then religious influence and power wanes which is a powerful trend you are seeing within Europe especially within the Nordic countries (whose populace is the happiest and best educated in the world) where non-believers are the fastest growing (a)religious demographic.
There is a reason people become more liberal and non-religious after they go to college. Students in college learn much more about the world and are exposed to many more ideas and people from around the country and from around the world which makes the world seem smaller and less scary. It harder to dehumanize and fear a people you have met or fear something you understand. This is really why conservatives strike so hard against education. It gets rid of your ignorance and fears so that you are harder to control. Without ignorance, suffering, and fear they have very little to hold on to in order to maintain control over people. Here are some modern anti-intellectual religious signs to help give you an idea that this mentality is alive and well within conservative religious circles.
With every advancement in science, medicine, and all other disciplines, pulling back one more fold in the veil of Humanity’s vast ignorance, religion loses one more sliver of power and control over the masses and nations. However, conservative religions will not go quietly into the deep abyss of ignorance and fear from whence they spawned. They will go kicking and screaming to try to prevent societal advancement to try to ensure that we all suffer from ignorance, fear, and division so as to be able maintain the control and power that it once had, but more importantly, to keep an iron-clad grasp on the illusion of the perceived truth of their belief system – dogma no matter the cost, which is conveniently similar to capitalism’s motto – profit at any cost.
Let us look to a modified quote from Yoda from Star Wars: The Phantom Menace which places this cycle in more clear focus. I added the ignorance part which is the true progenitor for this process in his quote:
Ignorance is the path to the dark side…
- ignorance leads to fear…
- fear leads to anger…
- anger leads to hatred…
- hatred leads to suffering
It is this process that education looks to help short-circuit by attempting to eliminate ignorance, which greatly reduces the people who may fall prey to the predatory and dehumanizing practices of conservative religions and hence world-wide suffering.
Absolution of Immoral Acts by an Imaginary Friend
There is this interesting meme that summarizes how all of the above comes together:
“Never trust a person who can clear their conscience of any immoral act by asking forgiveness from their imaginary friend.“
After exploring the subject of morality and religion directly and writing my post Morality vs Religion, I found the arrogance of the requirements of religious belief in order to be a good and moral person patently offensive and morally repugnant, especially in light of the examples laid forth in this section.
Religion is not the progenitor of morality. Humanity’s continuous evolution as a social species is. Therefore, in order to make the world a more peaceful and truly moral place, we must deny religion its self-claimed position as the universal moral authority, for so many vile acts against Humanity stem from this fallacious belief.
The mind-blowing book The Inner Level: How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone’s Well-Being covers the biopsychosocial affects of economic inequality, and has this wonderful passage on Humanity’s evolutionary development of pro-social values which would presage modern religions:
It is often thought that values such as honesty, generosity and kindness were almost invented by, and remain dependent on, religion. But although religious convictions and teachings may help to sustain standards of kindness and generosity (despite sometimes also creating problems of intolerance), we can now see that prosocial characteristics were instilled in us during human prehistory by the evolutionary power of social selection in egalitarian societies. As anthropological accounts of recent hunter-gatherer societies suggest, the tendency to value unselfishness, generosity and kindness dates back into the distant mists of time. Although religious belief can add emphasis to these instincts, prosocial values are etched more deeply into our evolved psychology and are much older than any religious ideology that has arisen in the last few thousand years.
The Inner Level: How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone’s Well-Being (Pickett and Wilkinson, 2019)
Religion Within the Humanity of Tomorrow
What is the Core Value System to All Religions?
Let us circle back to the beginning sections and look at where our contemporary societies are within the evolution of religions. Currently, we are in the era of Cosmopolitan Population Formations, so it is with this idea that I will form my answer. If you really look at global religions and compare them you will find that all religions are humanistic at their core, but steeped in the social, historical, political, mythological, and theological trappings of their formation. If we strip all of that excess stuff away, which is really only interesting from an academic, historical, theological, or philosophical standpoint, then what we will find is a stripped down form of Humanism – how to ethically treat each other and the environment.
What is exactly is Humanism? Here are some definitions for you:
- “Humanism is a philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers critical thinking and evidence (rationalism and empiricism) over acceptance of dogma or superstition.” (Wikipedia)
- “Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without theism or other supernatural beliefs, affirms our ability and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal fulfillment that aspire to the greater good” (American Humanist)
- “Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance that affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives. Humanism stands for the building of a more humane society through an ethics based on human and other natural values in a spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities. Humanism is not theistic, and it does not accept supernatural views of reality.” (International Humanist and Ethical Union)
- “Humanism is a broad category of ethical, metaphysical, epistemological and political philosophies in which human interests, values and dignity predominate. It has an ultimate faith in humankind, believes that human beings possess the power or potentiality of solving their own problems, through reliance primarily upon reason and scientific method applied with courage and vision.” (Philosophy Basics)
In essence, Humanism looks to and has faith in humanity, science, knowledge, ethic, and its institutions for the answers to all of life’s problems. It does not recognize nor seek supernatural or divine answers.
As pointed out above, when Humanity has exclaimed it was the gods or the supernatural, that doing so was merely a recognition of our ignorance and a powerful desire for a more satisfying label to assuage our peace of mind until the real answers are found… by science. Being able to say that we do not know without having to invoke the Gods of the Gap will bring Humanity closer together for religion will no longer divide us, because Humanity (and not dogma and fear) will be religion’s central focus. This will allow Humanity, as a collective whole, to really look at the solutions to the world’s problems, to help us all to progress together, sharing in our collective efforts and brilliance, lifting us ALL up and not just the a chosen few.
Those religions that have Humanism as the core of their philosophical and theological core are the religions that will really help humanity forward and will be part of the solution. If only they were as organized, driven and as active in the public sphere as conservative religions. What you will find as you take this into consideration, is that pretty much NO conservative religions are humanistic at their core because their fear based beliefs and dogmas are what are important (dogma and belief are what matters and is the primary focus and NOT humans) regardless of the cost to humans or the environment. For them to become part of the global solution by embracing a humanistic theology would require them to no longer be conservative for they would need to question and completely reject what they have been taught, to learn about the world at large, and to chose another system (or drastically reform their current system) which would demand that they love and show compassion for those that they currently revile and hate. It would require, in no small terms, a global theological revolution.
When Humanity and the environment becomes our primary philosophical, ethical, and religious concern then the dehumanization of our fellow humans will be a crime of the highest order, a literal crime against our humanity. If you will remember, the many horrors committed in the history of the world (racism, sexism, slavery, genocide, brutality, war, exploitation) are a result of this dehumanization. For this reason alone, having Humanity to shift towards humanistic beliefs is an imperative to save us from the extinction due to our many divisions. Until all religions world-wide embrace the humanistic cores to their theology and mythology they will continue to be a plague upon Humanity and the natural world.
A World Beyond Religion?
Religions will always exist and to think we can get rid of them is folly. You cannot outlaw ignorance or fear nor feelings of hopelessness, despair, wonder or existential curiosity or dread. Religions, as I have shown, at their very base, are about acknowledging and giving name to our ignorances and fears. Unless humanity somehow reaches the point where we know all of the things, then religions shall be with us in one form or another. I would hate to see the day when Humanity collectively, in its infinite hubris, states that we know everything that there is to know, for that will truly be the eve of the end of human existence.
With that being said, we can work towards a world which does not really need nor desire religions and where those who believe in a religion would be a social curiosity. Living beyond religion would be very empowering because each of us would then realize that we should and were able to do something to solve our problems. Not only would we want to help lift each other up, to protect the environment, and to help to solve ALL of our world’s problems because we could, but it would be an ethical imperative to do so.
Perhaps a world so advanced where ignorance, fear, hopelessness, despair and suffering essentially no longer exists? Can we really do this? Yes we can. We have the knowledge. We have the resources. We have the technology. But, we do not have the will as Humanity has so definitively shown year after year of Humanity’s dark and blood drenched history.
Some Steps to a World Beyond Religion
So, how do we get there from here? To get us to a world that is beyond religion and therefore beyond ignorance, fear, and poverty, first, as mentioned above, it will require an ethical and philosophical change – a shift to a human and environmental centered ideology not only in all global religions, but in all global cultures and societies. I have written my post: The 7 Philosophical Pillars for Peace in Humanity which lists those basic pillars which are as follows:
- Justice and Compassion
- Science and Technology
Please take the time to read that post which explains each of the Philosophical Pillars and why they are important. These need to form the central foundations of our religions and our global educational systems because they break down all of those walls that divide us and will promote a powerful and interdependent unity with each and every human on Earth as well as with the natural world. These are the foundations of a humanistic based new world.
The next steps are things such as:
- universal education
- universal health care
.. both of which form the foundations of equity, banishes ignorance, helps to pull people out of poverty, and empowers them to be all they desire to be. My post Policies to Transform the World goes over many of those many other policies to help get us there, and that list is really, really big especially in America which is really, really messed up due to the horrors of predatory capitalism.
A great example of countries that are already basically there are the countries with the best standard of living which are in Europe, specifically the Nordic countries. In those countries religion is slowly dying while the fastest growing denomination is non-belief. When a populace:
- is highly educated because it has free education
- is healthy because it has free health care
- is basically free of poverty (~3%)
… and therefore does not have to live in fear, then religion loses its ground and its power; and people no longer need false answers to assuage their fears and to provide hope.
Economic Systems and Religion
My post here may seem like a damning indictment of conservative religions, and you would be right, but this document is much, much more than that. As a powerful and convenient cross-over, this post is also meant as a damning indictment of capitalism and economic systems. Capitalism requires the dehumanization of humans and the commodification of everything, even human lives and the environment in order to create a perpetual stream of profit – every thing has a price tag – human lives, plants, animals, earth, water, air, etc… which results in: slave labor, poverty wages, unsafe working conditions; cutting vacation, wages, vacation, etc to save money; pollution, environmental destruction, broad wildlife extinctions. Profit at any cost to humanity or the natural world. We could even say that because of the complete lack of a moral foundation and conscience that capitalism requires in order for it to flourish that religions thrive.
This dehumanization gives rise to the many horrors which are required in order for capitalism to flourish: ignorance, fear, the many isms, poverty, war, slavery, genocide, etc… and, by extension, allows and even requires the existence of religions in order to help people to cope with plethora of Capitalism’s predations. If humanity is truly going evolve beyond and be free from religion and its horrors, then we must free ourselves from capitalism and economic systems.
If you want to know the hows and whys then check out my powerful post: The Cancer of Capitalism and Its Antidote and I will give you an overview there so you can see the cause-effect relationship. Humanity can do much, much better. We have the knowledge. We have the resources. We have the technology. We can make Earth a paradise for all of Humanity if we can just shake off the the oppressive and divisive shackles of capitalism, economic systems, and its required divisiveness and the dehumanization of our fellow humans.
Some Interesting Quotes
I am going to leave you with some quotes:
The brilliant Joseph Campbell who specialized in mythology and comparative religion:
“Mythology may, in a real sense, be defined as other people’s religion. And religion may, in a sense, be understood as popular misunderstanding of mythology.”
“Every religion, every mythology is true in this sense: It is true as metaphorical of the human and cosmic mystery.”
“Every myth is psychologically symbolic. Its narratives and images are to be read, therefore, not literally, but as metaphors.”
“What gods are there, what gods have there ever been, that were not from man’s imagination?”
“All religions are true but none are literal.”
“Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble.”
“Half the people in the world think that the metaphors of their religious traditions, for example, are facts. And the other half contends that they are not facts at all. As a result we have people who consider themselves believers because they accept metaphors as facts, and we have others who classify themselves as atheists because they think religious metaphors are lies.”
H.P. Lovecraft is a famous author of horror fiction with his Cthulu mythos.
“If religion were true, its followers would not try to bludgeon their young into conformity; but would merely insist on their unbending quest for truth, irrespective of artificial backgrounds or practical consequences”